To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / *533 (-5)
  Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
 
(...) Just an FYI, Only the torso and arms are Battle Droid parts. The Legs are actually more organic and bent at the knee. The are still fuzed like the BD lets though. Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
 
  Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
 
Hehe, I personaly like the battle droid "figs" but the legs would be ALOT beter if they wern't attached together... Now the alien figs, that's another story, LEGO could have done better. I'd think they'd look rather robotic with those BD parts, but (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
 
  Re: My thoughts on the 2001 sets (Life on Mars and LEGO Studios)
 
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3A250DB9.773C@m...ing.com... [ ... massively snipped but relevant to Life on Mars ... ] This morning at breakfast I gave a 2001 catalog to my five year old son. After he looked through it, I (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.reviews)
 
  Re: Wanted: Images of New Elements
 
(...) Heh. Yup, I intend to get a few of these. They are a bit tricky to work with, because they only connect in a straight line (no interlocking, I'm afraid), which is irritating. But it's still more options than we had before. Now I want one with (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
 
  Re: Wanted: Images of New Elements
 
(...) The TIE. Guess I should have mentioned that. :/ James (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR