To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trains.orgOpen lugnet.trains.org in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / Train Organizations / 59
58  |  60
Subject: 
Re: Train tables
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.loc.us.mn.msp
Date: 
Mon, 7 Jun 1999 13:12:22 GMT
Reply-To: 
LPIEN@stopspamCTP.IWANTNOSPAM.COM
Viewed: 
9 times
  
Paul Foster wrote:
>
But you still have to have an even number of modules, right?  So "A"
module
under construction will only replace one of Conan's modules until
another
module can be paired with it?

Yes, unless one built some sort of "wye" module, all the modules in use
must form a single closed loop (in the meta sense) to allow continuous
running.


--
Larry Pieniazek    http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Train tables
 
(...) But you still have to have an even number of modules, right? So "A" module under construction will only replace one of Conan's modules until another module can be paired with it? (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.loc.us.mn.msp)

19 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR