 | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
Methinks it would be easier in the long run to widen your trailer, or buy a new one, to run 45x60, rather than the totally oddball 40x65. ;-) (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
Wow, I would love to see that picture. (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
(...) Our group (The VLC) are about to meet to select a table format. We are leaning towards the PNLTC standard tables. We will be adjusting the width for maximum usage. I'm even thinking of bolt on Plexi glass to 'protect' our layouts. I've been (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
John Gerlach <john.gerlach@bestbu...ospam.com> wrote in message news:FruKv4.CA0@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) You need a bigger trailer! heehee :) I would seriously consider sticking with modules of standard baseplates, I know it is none of my (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
The PNLTC standard has been good to us. Transporting the legs, as James brings up, is a drawback, but they can be easily made with a minimal amount of materials beyond the scrap from the table top. And they are very sturdy. I've sat on the tables (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
