 | | Re: Stop the madness... —Eric Joslin
|
| | | (...) I think that each club should definitely handle speaking to TLC and other organisations on their own. I do not think that this meta-group should *ever* speak to TLC, or give TLC the impression that they (TLC) should address the meta-group (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Stop the madness... —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | (...) Buh. Brain lockup. Too many things at once. To finish my own thought (even though it's obvious): I *do* think that the meta-group should freely share and compare notes about the results of dealing with TLC and other organisations with one (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Stop the madness... —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) What if TLC *wants* a single group to which it can more conveniently communicate, instead of dealing with 10-12+ different groups? (...) ?? What if TLC or LD wants to support LTCs doing train shows by providing catalogs, K8s, signs, whatever. (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stop the madness... —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | (...) They can organise something, then. If they are in touch with 10 people from 10 different groups, they can easily send the same email to 10 people, for example. (...) Why would having this meta-group make things any easier for TLC? If TLC (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
