To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 8782
8781  |  8783
Subject: 
Re: Info o GMLTC Style Honeycomb structure
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Followup-To: 
lugnet.trains.org
Date: 
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:01:53 GMT
Reply-To: 
JOHNNEAL@USWEST.stopspamNET
Viewed: 
2709 times
  
James Brown wrote:

> In lugnet.trains, Steve Chapple writes:
> > In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> > > Kim Toll wrote:
> > > > I'm interested in building up a bit of a Lego landscape similar
> > > > to the GMLTC modules.
> > 
> > > ...the pattern we at the GMLTC have perfected.  Check it out here:
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=1734
> > 
> > I too am interested in the "honeycomb" pattern details.  No sense
> > "re-inventing the wheel".  The link seems to only provide a hint
> > though - it looks like one step in an instruction book of dozens?
> 
> Nope, it's all you need (for pictoral reference, anyway).  From left to right:
> 
> 2x2 bricks, in towers.  Height on these will vary depending on how
> high/stable you want your structure.  IIRC, GMLTC uses 5 high towers, Mike
> P. uses 6 high.  Both recommend not going much higher, or it gets unstable.
> 
> 2x4 bricks, bracing and interlocking the towers.  This would be done between
> tower sections (every 5 or 6 bricks high), and also just below the top layer.
> 
> 2x4 bricks, as the building surface.

Pretty much it.  The green bricks are your outside wall, and you tie into the
wall every 5-6 bricks high.  That is why you need the rim of 1x4s, to avoid
"disturbing" the alternating binding appearance from the outside.  It's a very
clean and elegant design which maximizes common bricks AND is nice and strong.

-John (FU set to org)

> 
> 
> I've been thinking about the possibilities of doing 5 or 6 high modules, to
> let us work some terrain variation in.  The real hitch with that is you
> start needing to store them, and you start needing to worry about
> transporting them.
> 
> James



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Info o GMLTC Style Honeycomb structure
 
(...) John & James, Thanks much for the pointer and the explanation. This is great! Its exactly the info I was looking for. Thanks. Kim P.S. Why the follow up to .org? Wasn't this train building related? (26 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains.org)
  Re: Info o GMLTC Style Honeycomb structure
 
(...) Are you guys, GMLTC, switching to a green surface? If not, why not? To expensive? Don't see the need? Just curious, Chris (26 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains.org)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Info o GMLTC Style Honeycomb structure
 
(...) Nope, it's all you need (for pictoral reference, anyway). From left to right: 2x2 bricks, in towers. Height on these will vary depending on how high/stable you want your structure. IIRC, GMLTC uses 5 high towers, Mike P. uses 6 high. Both (...) (26 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)

17 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR