 | | Re: Proof of a Hoax? (was: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn) —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | James Powell <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:FsB2pJ.JJ9@lugnet.com... (...) clear. (...) No, it will NOT CLEAR. It is on the "other side" in regards to being before the switch, but it is on the curved side instead of the (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 6 vs. 8 wide? —John Gerlach
|
| | | | (...) But what a nice dilemma to have! (I'd vote for 8-wide trains...) John Neal is too busy building *14* wide "G" scale cars... ;-) JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 6 vs. 8 wide? —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | | I realize that, but what if the simple installation of an automatic point makes clearance of 8-wide trains impossible? Do we then not allow the remote points on 8 wide layouts? What about layouts that are 6 wide, but will connect to 8 wide train (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
