 | | Re: Not LEGO, but trains( $$$ for 2200 foot loop of track) —John Gerlach
| | | | (...) <snip> (...) But by having electrically isolated lengths of track, you could start one train, and once it had moved onto the next section of track you could start another one. We could easily have ten trains running at once. JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Not LEGO, but trains( $$$ for 2200 foot loop of track) —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Or more. We would just need to make some of the blocks shorter so people could slow down trains that were gaining on the one in front of them while they were in the short block... but each regular block could have 2 trains on it at once, (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Not LEGO, but trains( $$$ for 2200 foot loop of track) —Jeff Elliott
| | | | | It's a long trek, but I think I'd come to Minneapolis to see a 2200' train layout. And if I came, I'd certainly bring my 60' of straight track. Y'know, I think there's enough people out there with 10' or more of straight track, that this *could* be (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | |
