Subject:
|
Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Feb 2000 02:10:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
JOHNNEAL@USWESTnospam.NET
|
Viewed:
|
1955 times
|
| |
|
|
Tony Priestman wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, John Neal (<38A246A4.48DF7A6E@uswest.net>) wrote at
> 05:03:40
>
> >
> > So I wouldn't say talking about scale is a waste of time, just sharing POVs:-)
>
> Ok. point taken :-)
>
> Perhaps what I mean is, there is no ultimate answer to the 'What Scale
> Is Lego?' question. Perhaps it deserves a FAQ entry. Perhaps there is
> one already. :-)
Ahh, if you phrase it "What scale are LEGO trains?",a question the GMLTC hears
constantly at train shows, the answer is a quick "L" scale (the GP isn't savvy
enough to handle "MF";-) What scale it approximates with respect to model
railroading is debate fodder in NGs:-)
-John
>
> --
> Tony Priestman
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...)
|
| On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, John Neal (<38A246A4.48DF7A6E@...west.net>) wrote at 05:03:40 (...) Ok. point taken :-) Perhaps what I mean is, there is no ultimate answer to the 'What Scale Is Lego?' question. Perhaps it deserves a FAQ entry. Perhaps there is (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
