 | | Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...) —William A. Swanberg
|
| | | One other "take" on model railroading (the one that I prefer, of course) is not to worry too much about the detail of models vs. prototype, or even scale, as long as you can recognize "that's a boxcar, that's a hopper, that's a Pullman, etc." I (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...) —Jonathan Reynolds
|
| | | | I agree with William here - there is so much more to model trains* than the phsical realism of the models. I would love to explore automated operation, bar-coded freight yards and more 'realistic' operation, all possible using Lego trains of course. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Well, I'm not so sure about the robust construction even when dropped part. I think most creations disassemble themselves when dropped on the floor. The difference from fine-scale models is that chances are nothing actually broke, and even if (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...) —Jonathan Reynolds
|
| | | | (...) It's all relative. Five minutes to replace a few bricks versus Several months painstaking skilled modelmaking/painting. I know which I'd rather do! (cue 'age of instant gratification ruining classic creative toys' debate) Jon (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
