To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 372
371  |  373
Subject: 
Re: UP engines (was Re: New pictures of 700, Potential challenge to big red
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 6 Jan 1999 19:17:27 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest.#nomorespam#net
Viewed: 
1527 times
  
Thank you for the history lesson Larry!  As usual, you are a plethora of information
and a good guy to have around.  You guessed correctly how I managed the trucks: one
attaches to the frame and the other hinges upon it.  I used four motor because, after
all, it is DD (all wheels powered).  It didn't look too prototypical going around a
corner, but as you pointed out, the prototype couldn't handle anywhere near our
turning radius constraints either.  This also made my initial attempts at connecting
freight very difficult.  Now I must put the proof in the posting. BTW, at the time I
built the EMD, I was not aware of GE's effort on two trucks- would be a lot easier to
model...  It's such a pity that all of the new locos are going to the "C" truck
design, making it near impossible given what limitations we are under. #1 wish- new
motor featuring 6 wheels (larger) AND gentler curved track.
-John





Message is in Reply To:
  UP engines (was Re: New pictures of 700, Potential challenge to big red
 
(...) Well, I'd love to see pics. UP as a firm is a source of some of the most behemoth engines ever... They are always trying to get more horsepower into one engine package than anybody, because they use more horsepower per train/ton than anybody (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR