 | | Exploring a new track radius —Ondrew Hartigan
|
| | | Quite a few of us in the community have wanted a new track radius for a very very long time. When we were in the 9v era the argument against it given was the metal rails would be too expensive. Now that we are in the RC era and the track is plastic (...) (11 years ago, 19-Jan-14, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Exploring a new track radius —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | In lugnet.trains, Ondrew Hartigan wrote: [snip details about alternate radius curved tracks] (...) I'm sure this has been discussed, but would it be better to make individual sleeper plates along with flexible rails that can be attached to the (...) (11 years ago, 20-Jan-14, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Exploring a new track radius —Ondrew Hartigan
|
| | | | (...) There are a few inherent issues with "flex track". Tying it into the current system, safety since metal rails can be sharp, Transporting the segments exc. Making just the ties was my initial idea too (apparently for other people as well) but (...) (11 years ago, 20-Jan-14, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Exploring a new track radius —Eric Olson
|
| | | | (...) We actually looked into that and found that the conductivity wasn't uniform across the entire piece. -Eric (11 years ago, 21-Apr-14, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
