To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 31076
31075  |  31077
Subject: 
Re: Question about gearing Power Functions-based trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:25:30 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
17945 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Jordan Bradford wrote:
   I’ve noticed that because the Emerald Night’s two sets of driver wheels are locked together, the engine struggles to go around corners: the outer wheels have further to turn, so the wheels slip and the engine’s movement becomes jerky.

Would it be sufficient to drive the engine using only one set of drivers?

How about using a differential?

Either way, would there be enough traction?

Actually, the 9V motor also had the same issue around corners, but I believe it was not caused by the required wheel slip, but by the increased friction on the flanges when they run at a (fairly large) angle to the rails on the corners. This is mainly caused by the very tight radius of the LEGO track. I don’t think either of your suggestions would make a huge difference.

But I Could Be Wrong.

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Question about gearing Power Functions-based trains
 
I've noticed that because the Emerald Night's two sets of driver wheels are locked together, the engine struggles to go around corners: the outer wheels have further to turn, so the wheels slip and the engine's movement becomes jerky. Would it be (...) (15 years ago, 19-Jan-10, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, FTX)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR