 | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Elroy Davis
|
| | | (...) Uncoupling is probably my biggest issue. Right now, I'm doing it by hand, which means holding a set of cars apart with one hand and working the speed control with the other. This isn't too much of a problem down in the yard, but it's a stretch (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Daniel Aubin
|
| | | | | (...) If you really want knuckle couplers for your LEGO trains, you could try these; (URL) They're made by Kadee (famous to all model railroad fans for their couplers). On their (URL) site>, they retail at 4,95$ for a pair. By modifying the shank (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Dave Curtis
|
| | | | | | (...) Using a standard #1 knuckle coupler is an interesting idea. But instead of using the raw shank version, why not go with one that is mounted in a draft gear box? A little epoxy or MEK could probably mount the draft gear box on a hacked brick. (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Tim David
|
| | | | | | (...) Jeff Christner used Kadees on his layout many years ago. His site is gone but the Wayback machine has the (URL) but unfortunatly only one pic. He also talks about it (URL) here> Ondrew Hartigan has also done (URL) some experimenting>. Tim (17 years ago, 30-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Tim David
|
| | | | | | (...) Jeff emailed me directly as he is having problems posting While my Kadee site has been down for awhile, I did give permission to another site to use my images and text which you can find (URL) here> I have never given anyone else permission to (...) (17 years ago, 1-Feb-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Rick Clark
|
| | | | The layout looks great (you will be so much happier with it when it's up on a table)! It's really hard to resist the temptation to make a loop, but point-to-point layouts have many more interesting possibilities. I think you'll be having fun with (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Elroy Davis
|
| | | | | (...) Those are all excellent. The manual pick works really well, even on my light skeleton log car. I tried a side uncoupler, but it pushes some of my light cars off the tracks. I love that remote switch. I may have to try that out. Thanks for the (...) (17 years ago, 29-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Tim David
|
| | | | | | | (...) Have you considered weighting your cars? I know the NMRA has a standard recommended weight for HO cars. Tim (17 years ago, 29-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Elroy Davis
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Most of my cars are okay. The one I have the most trouble with is my (URL) car>, which sometimes even hops the tracks during coupling if I don't have a log load on it. -Elroy (17 years ago, 29-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Tim David
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hmm, not much room for weight there, unless you have a load (17 years ago, 30-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . . —Jonathan Reynolds
|
| | | | | | (...) If the uncoupling is for the switching yard, have you considered an on-loco uncoupling device? It does have it's limitations but at least it can be moved around the layout realistically. See my effort.. (URL) like to build a trackside one too. (...) (17 years ago, 30-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Remote Switch (was: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . .) —Elroy Davis
|
| | | | (...) I love Rick's awesome spear switch idea. I kept running it through my head to see if I could make it any smaller. I came up with something this morning: (2 URLs) Full Gallery of my prototype> I only have technic motors, so I wanted a solution (...) (17 years ago, 2-Feb-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Remote Switch (was: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . .) —Lawrence A. Crumb
|
| | | | I am new at this. I have some 4531 switches (points) that are from LEGO. The main line is always powered. The side line is only powered when the switch is thrown to that side. looking at the MOC in this thread it seem that another tpye of switch is (...) (17 years ago, 3-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
