 | | Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics? —Brian Davis
|
| | | (...) OK, I saw that and had to link to this: (URL) instinct, slightly more primitive implementation :). (17 years ago, 21-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics? —Rafe Donahue
|
| | | | (...) Thanks, Brian, for providing once again that sick, humbling feeling that I'm now feeling. <sigh> I guess I'll go back to building sets straight out of the box according to the directions ... Rafe (17 years ago, 22-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics? —Brian Davis
|
| | | | (...) That's OK, you must have missed the original thread I introduced this on, where I directly blamed you for my obsession: (URL) I guess I'll go back to building sets straight out of the (...) Well, that's almost all I did. It's just the box (...) (17 years ago, 22-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics? —Rafe Donahue
|
| | | | (...) seen the whole thing. In reading through it, I recalled reading it when it was fresh but lost interest when some yahoo screwed up the 3-4-5 right triangle angle measures... I'll admit right here that I know nothing of these M and Q and A (...) (17 years ago, 22-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics? —Brian Davis
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, I understand. The standards on LUGNET have sunk to the point where just about *anyone* can post. I mean just *imagine* getting something as basic as that wrong... sheesh... (...) Funny, my students in my 100-level astronomy class said (...) (17 years ago, 22-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
