Subject:
|
Re: 9v train motor compared to IR train motor
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:20:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjmasi@*nogarbageplease*verizon%spamcake%.net
|
Viewed:
|
4765 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
jopiek wrote:
> AFAIK is the IR motor much lighter, did you try to compensate using those lead
> bricks (2x2x6 like in the 12V trains)?! My santa fe is also not doing so well in
> comparison to the 7760 (which is the best train in balance/pulling a heavy train
> IMHO).
>
> Johan
I don't think adding weight to the engine would help (the engine weighs
about 1 kg). The wheels weren't slipping. The motor just slowed to a
stop because the train was too heavy.
Chris
--
http://mysite.verizon.net/cjmasi/lego/
Learn about brittle bone disease
http://www.oif.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: 9v train motor compared to IR train motor
|
| AFAIK is the IR motor much lighter, did you try to compensate using those lead bricks (2x2x6 like in the 12V trains)?! My santa fe is also not doing so well in comparison to the 7760 (which is the best train in balance/pulling a heavy train IMHO). (...) (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
5 Messages in This Thread: ![9v train motor compared to IR train motor -Christopher Masi (6-Oct-07 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: 9v train motor compared to IR train motor -Johan Korten (11-Oct-07 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: 9v train motor compared to IR train motor -Benn Coifman (15-Oct-07 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 9v train motor compared to IR train motor -Christopher Masi (18-Oct-07 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|