To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 27776
27775  |  27777
Subject: 
Re: BBB wheels "x-4-x" steam configuration BKM
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:27:50 GMT
Viewed: 
2655 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Steven Barile wrote:
HI All,
Since that last post generated some traffic perhaps this will too! :)

I am building a “4-8-4” (no prototype in mind) steam engine. I decided to fix
the "8" wheels to the boiler/chassis and have the front and rear trucks extended
on a pivot arms. Two 9v motors are under the baggage car (part of my Northern
Pacific Passenger consist) and I plan one more under the tender, so the engine
will be completely passive. The question/issue is when pushing the rear truck
which both swivels and rotates is doomed through “S” curves and switches…

What have others done with that rear “floating” truck to minimize derailing?

SteveB


I think the answer, if you can, is to seperate the tender connection from the
rear truck. Obviously the connection need to be pivotted at some point above or
foward of the truck so it becomes a question of minimising the height the
truck/coupling beam takes up.

Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  BBB wheels "x-4-x" steam configuration BKM
 
HI All, Since that last post generated some traffic perhaps this will too! :) I am building a “4-8-4” (no prototype in mind) steam engine. I decided to fix the "8" wheels to the boiler/chassis and have the front and rear trucks extended on a pivot (...) (18 years ago, 18-Aug-06, to lugnet.trains)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR