 | | Re: Review of 7897 Passenger Train available at ILTCO site —Elroy Davis
|
| | | (...) Larry, Thanks for the write-up. While I dig the idea of being able to slot different axles through the motor (possibly for uses other than trains), the idea of only being able to pull a couple of cars bums me out. Still, I won't know for sure (...) (19 years ago, 11-May-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Review of 7897 Passenger Train available at ILTCO site —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) no prob. (...) Me too. I think one reason for the large nose, thinwalls for windows, and large roof pieces is to save weight. (19 years ago, 11-May-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Review of 7897 Passenger Train available at ILTCO site —Andréas Rootzén
|
| | | | (...) Thanx for sharing. I like the possibility to use it with technic, but why not recievers on both sides or radio-control? Theories? /Andréas (19 years ago, 11-May-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Review of 7897 Passenger Train available at ILTCO site —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Sorry if I was not clear, it does have receivers on both sides of the unit. But there still are blind spots like when it is edge on to you. (19 years ago, 11-May-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
