 | | Re: Yes, but what IS it?????
|
|
(...) You're changing to 10 wide??? :) (18 years ago, 28-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Yes, but what IS it????? [Pt. 2]
|
|
(...) Hey nice foot bridge! I think it might be a little on the low side though... GDR! Eric (18 years ago, 28-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Yes, but what IS it????? [Pt. 2]
|
|
Here's the next bit then. Maybe this doesn't help much if you were thinking along the right lines already, but hopefully it'll put a stop to the more bizarre conjecture; yes, I'm looking at you, Crawford. (URL) Jason R (18 years ago, 28-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Yes, but what IS it?????
|
|
(...) Alright for some. Others in this world don't have the space for real bricks Tim (18 years ago, 28-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic 2-Wide Trains
|
|
(...) and (URL) Peer Kruger's one> and (URL) Ross Neal's one> Tim (18 years ago, 28-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Yes, but what IS it?????
|
|
(...) You tell him Eric. Jason R (18 years ago, 28-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Yes, but what IS it?????
|
|
(...) Some people's minds just work at that level I suppose... I blame t'internet. Jason R (18 years ago, 28-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Yes, but what IS it?????
|
|
(...) What are you saying? There's more than one Tim??? No, I've already done one of those (URL) here>, and I'm sticking with that. Although I do prefer a simpler 6x8 and 2x8 combination for the roof now. I suppose I could update those instructions (...) (18 years ago, 28-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic 2-Wide Trains
|
|
(...) (URL) is possible .... JB (18 years ago, 28-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic 2-Wide Trains
|
|
(...) Way cute, Good to see the micro scene slowly building in strenght, Now all we need is to see it moterized :) Aaron (18 years ago, 26-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
