 | | Re: Still more —Mathew Clayson
|
| | | (...) I noticed this as well, I'm guessing the old moters were used for testing and early photos, but the final product will have plastic wheels. I'm really hoping that the IR reciever is not permanently coupled the the motor unit. Use a standard 9v (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.year.2006, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Still more —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | (...) I was getting my hopes up looking at the boxcars - in the first pictures they looked orange, but here they're clearly red. I guess that makes the car on the flatbed red too. The red fork-lift looks good; it just seems unusual for Lego to do (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.year.2006, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Still more —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | "Mathew Clayson" <mathew_impact1@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Isn9pM.B4C@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) [ ... snipped ... ] The battery container, the IR receiver, and the baseplate are all one unit. The motor is a separate unit, same (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.year.2006)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Still more —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Hmm, does this mean the new motor could drive BBB wheels directly? That would be way cool for steam designers. Frank (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.year.2006)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | New Trains and BBB Wheels? (was: Re: Still more) —Ben Fleskes
|
| | | | (...) Good question. I'm eager to order a set and find out how BBB wheels will do with the new battery powered trains. I've tried BBB wheels with the 845 motor: (URL) Which easily accepts a technic axle. With large BBB drivers, at 9V the speed is a (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.year.2006, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Trains and BBB Wheels? (was: Re: Still more) —Matthew J. Chiles
|
| | | | (...) I wonder if you could use the new IR motor in a steam engine, driving the drivers, and an old 9V motor in the tender. With a wire between the two, you could have a double-powerful steam engine, with powered drivers and standard transformer (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Trains and BBB Wheels? (was: Re: Still more) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | (...) That would seem to be correct, but you're forgetting that if you put big wheels on the battery motor, and connect it to a 9V motor with its small wheels, they'll try to go at different speeds (assuming, as has been suggested, that the motor (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Trains and BBB Wheels? (was: Re: Still more) —Mathew Clayson
|
| | | | (...) Yep, I can only dream that the adjusted the gear ratio in the new motors. The current 9v train motors run way to fast, I'd gladdly trade that for a bit more torque. But even at differnt speeds, the BBB wheels have less traction, allowing them (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Trains and BBB Wheels? (was: Re: Still more) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | (...) I think the process you're describing is referred to as 'clutching'... ...at straws... ;-) Jason Railton (19 years ago, 18-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Trains and BBB Wheels? (was: Re: Still more) —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
|
| | | | (...) No idea about the torque, but personally I doubt it could have been improoved (would empty the batteries too fast). The speed of the new trains is more or less the same as now: a Metroliner waggon at full speed of the IR train derailed. (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
