To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 21899
21898  |  21900
Subject: 
Re: Another Motorized Switch Design :-)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:46:17 GMT
Viewed: 
1778 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Mark Riley wrote:
   In lugnet.trains, Chris Phillips wrote:
   In lugnet.trains, Mark Riley wrote:
   New version! Now, the main body is only 4x6 studs:



This redesign is absolutely brilliant! Time to make a couple dozen automated switch points...

Thanks Chris, but apparently this design as it stands is too sensitive to the clutch strength of the components being used. Yesterday, I ran it over 100 times without the hint of a problem, but today after partially disassembling and reassembling it, it won’t go more than about 50 switches without self-destructing. I think the primary issue is keeping the motor from seperating from the base. Have to think about this...

Mark

I built one of Marks last night, and yes, even with the ‘closed studs’ and other avenues of ‘keepin’ it together’, the plates adn motor do eventually come loose. Sometimes it’s 20 times, sometimes it’s 60-80 times, but the unit does work itself to ‘self destruct mode.

Let me tell you that when the Metroliner is zooming around the layout and all of a sudden there’s a 2x3 panel on the rails... much fun and destruction ensues :)

Thank goodness some guy whom I can’t remember made up DCC for LEGO trains... Full stop on all locos, thus preventing cascading train wrecks :)

Anyway, As for fixing... if there’s a way to get a half thick technic beam to bound the bottom and top together... but I can’t figure out how--or maybe some other ‘technic-way’ of locking the unit together...

I’ll try a few things tonight.

Dave K



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Another Motorized Switch Design :-)
 
(...) Dave, which version did you build (the 4x8 version or the 4x6 version)? My 4x8 seems to be holding together at the moment... knock on wood. I did notice that the transparent panels (vs. the opaque ones) are made of a stiffer material and seem (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Another Motorized Switch Design :-)
 
(...) Thanks Chris, but apparently this design as it stands is too sensitive to the clutch strength of the components being used. Yesterday, I ran it over 100 times without the hint of a problem, but today after partially disassembling and (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

19 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR