Subject:
|
Re: "Break'n the Law, Break'n the Law" Rail Racer style
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:47:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1085 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, James Trobaugh wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > So James, which part is the "loco" and which part is the "rolling stock"?
> > Great looking railer!!!!
>
>
>
> This is a rear engine racer, so the back would be the "loco" while the "rolling
> stock" actually slides over part of the "loco" for a clean look.
>
> The front section ("rolling stock") does have it's own wheels and couples to the
> engine section ("loco") so it's stays well with in the guidelines of a modified
> racer.
>
> Be prepared to give up the title this year Rob!
>
> jt
A very cool looking beast indeed - but does the aerofoil actually contribute to
its track-holding capability? ... and I hope the racing will be recorded on
video for those of us who can't make it ...
SteveH (BeLUG)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "Break'n the Law, Break'n the Law" Rail Racer style
|
| (...) This is a rear engine racer, so the back would be the "loco" while the "rolling stock" actually slides over part of the "loco" for a clean look. The front section ("rolling stock") does have it's own wheels and couples to the engine section (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
