Subject:
|
Re: Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:59:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1607 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In article <H91I1I.Gr6@lugnet.com>, "Thomas Michon" <thomas@michon.com>
wrote:
> Blue panels are far superior in appearance, but be sure to not use blue
> bricks for your walls.
>
> Here's an example of blue panels in a skyscraper I did a while back.
>
> http://www.scltc.org/images/galleries/shows/02.05.04fullertonlayout/02.05.04fu
> llertonlayout239.jpg
>
> http://www.scltc.org/images/galleries/shows/02.05.04fullertonlayout/02.05.04fu
> llertonlayout017.jpg
Oh my that is big! Putting size aside for a moment. That is a great
looking building. Unfortunately, I must admit that I find the logo on
the top of the building a bit distracting.
Love the work, and I think the trans blue windows are better for sky
scrappers too (not that I have built one though)
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread: ![Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent? -Tony Kilaras (20-Jan-03 to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent? -Amy Hughes (20-Jan-03 to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent? -Tony Kilaras (20-Jan-03 to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent? -Thomas Michon (21-Jan-03 to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|