To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 19098
19097  |  19099
Subject: 
Re: Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:59:12 GMT
Viewed: 
1763 times
  
In article <H91I1I.Gr6@lugnet.com>, "Thomas Michon" <thomas@michon.com>
wrote:

Blue panels are far superior in appearance, but be sure to not use blue
bricks for your walls.

Here's an example of blue panels in a skyscraper I did a while back.

http://www.scltc.org/images/galleries/shows/02.05.04fullertonlayout/02.05.04fu
llertonlayout239.jpg

http://www.scltc.org/images/galleries/shows/02.05.04fullertonlayout/02.05.04fu
llertonlayout017.jpg

Oh my that is big! Putting size aside for a moment. That is a great
looking building. Unfortunately, I must admit that I find the logo on
the top of the building a bit distracting.

Love the work, and I think the trans blue windows are better for sky
scrappers too (not that I have built one though)

Chris



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent?
 
Blue panels are far superior in appearance, but be sure to not use blue bricks for your walls. Here's an example of blue panels in a skyscraper I did a while back. (URL) this helps with your choice of aesthetics! - Thomas Michon www.scltc.org (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)  

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR