Subject:
|
Re: My experience at Legoland USA
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Jul 1999 03:36:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
727 times
|
| |
|
|
Of course I was not implying that our scale of model trains is inferior
to those made by the master builders. In fact, I believe that ours is far
superior to theirs.
TLG markets train sets to minifig size. I think Miniland should have been
geared toward minifig sizing of vehicles, buildings, houses, etc. What a
concept, promoting their own products with their theme park.
Carrie
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> I'd put Miniland scale at more like G... what we do is fairly close to
> O, inasmuch as you can say that we work to any scale in particular.
>
> Carrie Whitcher wrote:
> > There is a huge train layout,
> > much larger than the stuff we do. It is probably in O scale.
>
> I'd say that PNLTC and GMLTC layouts are no slouches, sizewise.
>
> --
> Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
> - - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
> fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
> lugnet.
>
> NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
> will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My experience at Legoland USA
|
| I'd put Miniland scale at more like G... what we do is fairly close to O, inasmuch as you can say that we work to any scale in particular. (...) I'd say that PNLTC and GMLTC layouts are no slouches, sizewise. (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
