 | | Re: No big Deal: B-Unit for 10020 Super Chief —James Trobaugh
| | | | Looks good to me Ben. So basicly the B-unit cost twice as much as the A-unit?! Hmmmm, how are the B-units supposed to be a good deal for the railways :) jt (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: No big Deal: B-Unit for 10020 Super Chief —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Um, they're not. It just took some stubborn railways a while to learn that. (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: No big Deal: B-Unit for 10020 Super Chief —James Powell
| | | | | (...) Union rules. Back when, anything with a number was a loco. Since a B unit had no number, it was not a loco, hence not needing a crew... That's why you see 300F, 300A, 300 B, 300C for example on a ABBA arrangement of F units (IIRC, that was (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | |
