 | | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
"Bryan Kinkel" <helpdesk@loseyourmind.com> wrote in message news:GrLB49.IMF@lugnet.com... (...) given it hadn't been mentioned here! It's a neat set, for sure. Personally I'd rather have seen a blue train, making it more suitable for UK prototypes, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
The second time I called I was allowed to pre-order it. KL (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) That's a huge understatement. I think we've all been smoked by this one. And to think that with few exceptions, we had all the pieces to do it. Whoever designed this set gets a great big gold star! KL (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
I just called S@H and they said you can't place an order until the 19'th! I wonder If I'll remember to order it on the 19th. KL (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
Why would this set include a certificate of authenication? "Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:GrLD7F.21K@lugnet.com... (...) how (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
