 | | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
Paul Rutenberg <paul_germany@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FsA9v1.9Cs@lugnet.com... (...) gtfthis is (...) The problem I have with believing this is that virtually all of our collective dreams appear to have come true: Digital control (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains) !
|
| |
| | Re: Proof of a Hoax? (was: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn)
|
|
Andreas Stabno <stabno@megsinet.net> wrote in message news:FsAv72.EDJ@lugnet.com... (...) automated (...) parts (...) the (...) from (...) connections? The outside rails are always live (while there's power being applied to the track) - the inner (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) Sure - since the specs are being set, a ClearanceCar can be defined. Anyone building a layout that doesn't allow it to clear gets a wedgie ;-) All you need are LWH, and pivot point distances from the ends for the center of the trucks, and each (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Proof of a Hoax? (was: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn)
|
|
There's something that has been bothering me with those pictures of automated points and I finally realized what it is. The power connectors to drive the switching motor are connected to both parts of the point. One is attached to the straight part (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
(...) looks (...) I just blew these up in my image editor and can say with certainty that the three most obvious cuts are: 1) perpendicular (sp?) to the rail, and 2) in the exact same place for all three track parts!! Will (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
