To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / *5425 (-5)
  Re: April 1st sometime in the world ... ? (Re: New Trains)
 
(...) Image quality is a big part of determining if it is a fake. IMO, at least. For example, is it just a bad scan? What evidence is there for or against this? One piece of evidence is that many of the colors are too universal for it to be a scan. (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)  
 
  Re: April 1st sometime in the world ... ? (Re: New Trains)
 
(...) ?? <set:4551> ++Lar (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)  
 
  Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
 
(...) Hmm, interesting, can one come up with a single car? One thing I immediately wondered is if the clearance specs define a maximum distance between wheelsets (actually between truck pin) and a maximum extension beyond this point, would you get (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)  
 
  Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
 
(...) Why aren't the 'leak police' all over this one like a rash? Tom? regards lawrence (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)  
 
  Re: April 1st sometime in the world ... ? (Re: New Trains)
 
(...) It _is_ a bit strange that the red 4460 has metal rims on all the wheels, though. Surely, only two pairs are powered. On the other hand, mixing metal and non-metal rims on one engine would probably look daft. Fredrik (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR