Subject:
|
Re: Is bigger better? Or is detail what counts?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 21:14:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
918 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.town, Dave Amos writes:
> Throughout my time as a Lego city builder, I have noticed that there are
> (roughly) two different types of towns. One kind has very large buildings,
> with grand skylines. It is bold and makes a great impression on people.
> Some examples include the Brick Apple, Bricktopia, and Ed Boxers Lego Town.
>
> The other kind is lower to the ground, often smaller. Its primary appeal is
> the quaintness and attention to every detail. One such example is Kevin
> Zwicker's town.
>
> I am blown away by both types and have spent hours pouring over the things
> that make these towns great.
>
> I am interested to know people's thoughts regarding two varieties of Lego
> cities. Do you all have a preference? Is bigger better for you? Or
> "character"? Can you have both?
>
> -Dave
> www.bricktannia.com
I'd say yeah, i love seeing towns with lots of detail, & large buildings can
have lots of detail to them. I've been shooting for a middle ground with
mine, with larger buildings, but yet enough detail to make it all look good.
Josh
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Is bigger better? Or is detail what counts?
|
| Throughout my time as a Lego city builder, I have noticed that there are (roughly) two different types of towns. One kind has very large buildings, with grand skylines. It is bold and makes a great impression on people. Some examples include the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-01, to lugnet.town)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
