 | | Re: LOTS of new images uploaded.
|
|
(...) The 8465, 8466 and 3804 boxes look really cool IMHO. :-) -Gaurav Thakur, raving madman Can be reached at cp5670@supermail.com (URL) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LOTS of new images uploaded.
|
|
I agree those two new Technic boxes do look good.. -- Jason King LugNet #665 Gaurav Thakur <cp5670@supermail.com> wrote in message news:GF1G47.AuH@lugnet.com... (...) page: (...) what (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LOTS of new images uploaded.
|
|
Box looks better than the car..... Duq "Jason King" <jklugnet665@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:GF1qos.9t3@lugnet.com... (...) all (...) shop.lego.com. (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LOTS of new images uploaded.
|
|
Actually I don't mind the car, but i would prefer Technic beams over the Shaped Panels... It must be a fair size model when you consider how big the Power Puller Wheels are.. -- Jason King LugNet #665 Duq <Duq@nlgateway.net> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LOTS of new images uploaded.
|
|
(...) I got a new catalog with my 1371 and It's got pictures of 8265 and 8266. It's quite clear from the picture of 8266 that the frame is built of black Technic beams. Frank (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LOTS of new images uploaded.
|
|
Ok, Sorry I mean use technic beams for the outside as well, Like the 8880 Supercar. However i think that age has passed and the decorative panels are here to stay. It's just they aren't very useful for much else, Where as you can never have too many (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LOTS of new images uploaded.
|
|
(...) Looks that way. Though judging by the 8448 I don't personally consider that an extraordinarily bad thing. (...) Few things are both decorative and useful. The two terms are by their very definitions opposed to each other. (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LOTS of new images uploaded.
|
|
Ray Kremer <raykremer@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GF5spz.1r7@lugnet.com... (...) that an (...) Yes the 8448 is a good set to look at, But it is not as good for parts. (...) very (...) Very true.. But I don't have to like it. :-) -- Jason King (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LOTS of new images uploaded.
|
|
(...) I don't know. I think it has a pretty good set of pieces compared to all the other sets currently availible: (URL) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
