Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Sets Ranked by LUGNET Members (Fri 1 Apr 2005)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic.bionicle
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:33:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9429 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.statistics, LUGNET Server wrote:
I’m not sure how seriously to take this poll. It doesn’t have a single Bionicle
set! It looks like a brick separator is a better “set” than, say, the
Rahkshi, which (in my book) is one of the top
five designs to ever come out of Billund.
| |
Rank
| | Rating
| | Set
|
| | #1
| | 95.45
| | |
| | #2
| | 95.41
| | |
|
- snip -
Hmf. Invalid data, I say. Statistical error. User input fault. But this is a
travesty, an outrage, and I demand something be done about it!
This all has to be the fault of the admins.[1]
Kelly
[1] Ya ya, I are one. And I’m sure the data’s accurate per the input... I
respect Todd’s coding skills far to much to imply a Perl error. And ya, I know,
it’s the audience. But this just screamed for an indignant post. ;) ;) <- note
smileys. ;) But I’m serious about the Rahkshi.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
