|
Hey All,
I normally post in .castle but couldn't resist putting in my two cents here.
I agree with Adrian (nice web page BTW) about pieces from other themes being
used for space. I think that any piece from any theme can probably be used
in some other theme. Some might be difficult (I can't think of how I might
use a Bohrok canopy on one of my castles, but give me some time) :-). Heck,
the new Star Wars star destroyer uses "castle" theme goblets as accents. Up
until recently those have been a castle and town only piece. I have found a
way to use bionicle pieces in my castle stuff. I used the original Lewa's
axe for a giant's weapon. Some of the masks would work good too if you
could find a way to attach them to a technic guy's head. Anyway just some
rambling thoughts.
Thanks,
Josh
In lugnet.technic.bionicle, Adrian Drake writes:
> Hey, you're welcome to your opinion and I'm certainly not going to bash you
> for it. While I agree that the bionicle parts do seem to be "hanging on",
> they are, after all, a different color then the rest of the model (that
> pseudo-silver as opposed to red and black elsewhere), I patently disagree
> with your assertion that they're not 'spacy' enough. What really defines
> 'spacy', anyway? It's my opinion that any piece, from any theme, can be
> used in Space. That's part of the charm of the theme in general. That's
> how you get things like walkie talkies and binoculars and pistols and
> shovels used as details. I refuse to look down on a part made by Lego
> simply due to the the theme from which it comes. If I actually owned any
> Jack Stone, I'm sure I'd work hard to come up with a way to use those pieces
> in my creations.
>
> Cheers (and keep criticizing, it's sort of refreshing to see *grin*)
>
> Adrian
> --
> www.brickfrenzy.com
>
> In lugnet.technic.bionicle, John Henry Kruer writes:
> > Hello, Adrian,
> > While the piece use is awesome, and the studless design is really neat, I
> > dunno about the all the bionicle stuff.
> >
> > In Jon's M-Wing, and in your awesome Megaera, the bionicle pieces are used
> > to supplement the overall shape of the model, adding detail and just plain
> > coolness. But in the FireWasp, the bionicle pieces make the form. The
> > limit on bionicle pieces comes into play- while little blaster disks look
> > like engines, and little bionice legs make for an interesting honeycombed
> > wing, the big bionicle shoulder plates and the big bionicle flames/skates/?
> > just seem a bit overboard. The little 'flame' and the openings in the
> > 'skate' piece just detract from the overall look of the awesome wing idea,
> > and the big bionicle parts just don't appear 'spacy' enough. The whole
> > design seems to just hang on the eight bionicle pieces, which don't fullfill
> > their part well. It just looks- well, like bits of Toa and Bohrok put
> > together to make a spaceship.
> >
> > I don't intend to bash your MOC- its really great, and you obviously put a
> > lot of work into is. I'm just commenting on bionicle parts in general.
> >
> > -JHK
> > (intending no flames whatsoever)
> >
> > In lugnet.announce.moc, Adrian Drake writes:
> > > Wasn't there some complaining in .space about nothing new happening? Well,
> > > how about this. Here's a little ship I built over the weekend after getting
> > > inspired by a couple of the new Bionicle Nuva sets. First was Palmer's
> > > M-Wing, then my Megaera, and now this. The fusion between Space and
> > > bionicle continues!
> > >
> > > Adrian
> > > --
> > > www.brickfrenzy.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: new MOC: FireWasp
|
| Hey, you're welcome to your opinion and I'm certainly not going to bash you for it. While I agree that the bionicle parts do seem to be "hanging on", they are, after all, a different color then the rest of the model (that pseudo-silver as opposed to (...) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)
|
8 Messages in This Thread: ![new MOC: FireWasp -Adrian Drake (27-Oct-02 to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: new MOC: FireWasp -John Henry Kruer (28-Oct-02 to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: new MOC: FireWasp -Adrian Drake (28-Oct-02 to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: new MOC: FireWasp -Gil Shaw (28-Oct-02 to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: new MOC: FireWasp -Adrian Drake (28-Oct-02 to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: new MOC: FireWasp -Gil Shaw (28-Oct-02 to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: new MOC: FireWasp -James Harkness (7-Nov-02 to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|