 | | Re: flying helicopter? (was: orrery update) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | (...) The chinook gets around this by having the rotors on different levels - the rear one is sufficiently high to ensure it can't hit the front. (...) Yes, enough power to lift a LEGO helicopter would definitely be a challenge 8?) ROSCO (21 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: flying helicopter? (was: orrery update) —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | | "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:H9tAp0.A1n@lugnet.com... (...) challenge 8?) i'm working on it i developed new fixed 3 blade rotor in a week or two i should be prepared to show you the results of my work regards pixel (21 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: flying helicopter? (was: orrery update) —Steven Lane
|
| | | | (...) That's not actually right. The chinook has a shaft connecting the rotors keeping them in sync. It has to have one as rotor blades are very flexible. Otherwise their would be a danger of the front rotors bending upwards and hitting the rear (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
