 | | Re: 8475
|
|
I have to say -surprisingly, this looks like maybe TLC is getting more on track. This set seems to have much more potential than I expected. Not being able to pry this away from my 10 year old who was busily building, I had to wait until he went to (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8475
|
|
Does anyone have pics of these parts up on the web anywhere? I can't really get the idea from the text descriptions. --Jack Gregory "John Heins" <Johnmhiii@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0rK02.99z@lugnet.com... (...) points (...) the (...) body (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8475
|
|
And if someone does take it upon themselves to snap pictures: I'd also love to see a sideview and topview comparison of the 8475 wheels with their off-road tires vs. the 8466/8458 wheels with their off-road tires, and the same comparisons using each (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8475
|
|
(...) Greetings, Hope these pictures help clear up some questions. First time for me using the camera so they aren't as clear as I would like them but I thought you would want to see the new parts : ) Lots of promise with these parts and I want to (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8475
|
|
In lugnet.technic, John Morgan writes: sorry about that ... didnt know how to create direct links to the images... (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8475
|
|
Many thanks to John Morgan for putting the pictures up. My question (to John Heins or anyone who can answer) is based on looking at those images. "John Heins" <Johnmhiii@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0rK02.99z@lugnet.com... (...) points (...) Has (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8475
|
|
(...) I put some info here a while back; (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8475
|
|
Wow, thanks for the pics. I am absolutely _shocked_ at how much smaller the 8475 rims and wheels are. I thought they were maybe 2/3 to 3/4 the size of the 8466/8458 equivalents. I was totally fooled -- they are barely half the size. Impressive that (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
