 | | Re: Death of the studded brick —Matthew Miller
| | | | (...) It's not a new thing -- the trend was definitely there in 1996's <set:8422>. There's still beams with studs, but it's not the primary means of construction. (...) I don't think so. Technic may go more this way, but the system lines won't so (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Death of the studded brick —Damian Garcia
| | | | | Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) <set:8422>. (...) I was surprised at how many beams came with 8448. I agree. (...) part (...) Again I agree. System bricks don't connect to Duplo or Primo[1], right? [1][2] ...or should I call it Baby now? (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Death of the studded brick —Frank Filz
| | | | | (...) System bricks do connect to DUPLO, but only 2xY bricks, fairly secure (the tube fits into the hollow in the DUPLO stud). DUPLO will also connect to System bricks (but not as well as the other way around). Unfortuanately, DUPLO baseplates don't (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
