 | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson writes: <snip> (...) flood the Technic group? My definition of flooding would be scores of posts in a matter of days. Since the beginning of 2002, there has been a grand total of 123 Bionicle posts. It seems like (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | RE: Bi*nicle folks went away? —William Howard
|
| | | | | (...) And don't forget the very, very meaningful debate about what MOTM should be called! Think that one got 72 per hour at one point. Discussion is healthy, its what sets us apart from the apes (or should that be Rahi?) William (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | | (...) That was meaningful to me, I got my name. The useless flame-war if Tim was right or not was a pity though since both him and I had agreed already. AND PLEASE DON'T BRING THIS DISCUSSION BACK TO LIFE AGAIN :))) (...) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) Did I mention English is my second language? Flood is obviously wrong word here, but I think I can turn this to my right :) Imagine the .technic.bionicle group has a wide stream of messages, if it get's to crowded they will flood .bionicle and (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | (...) the biggest single Bionicle discussion wasn't about Bionicle dierctly but about the avatars on Brickshelf. A regrettably polarizing situation that was resolved nicely by the various admins. - Kyle (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
