 | | RE: Bi*nicle folks went away? —William Howard
|
| | | (...) Isn't that an oxymoron? William (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | (...) It seems that William has taken up the challenge to put his parts where his mouth is. (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: Bi*nicle folks went away? —William Howard
|
| | | | (...) his (...) Nah! I like the Bionicle bits - lovely colours, great parts, love the ball and socket stuff, but the only thing you (may) be seeing from me are pneumatic walkers using the lift arm with ball parts as legs and other such creatures. (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | (...) Stipulated! I thought the fact of your response to the challenge was acceptance enough. :) I'm thinking of giving it a go myself, but I'm afraid the existence of such a massively recursive Technic model may open a rift in the time/space (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
