| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Dean Hystad
|
| | (...) It is a concern that LEGO seams to be doing so many things wrong (not only my opinion, but a reasonable deduction based on their recent financial losses). And I find nothing wrong with people expressing their concerns in this forum. I event (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? John Barnes
|
| | | | Every so often, I feel compelled to comment. So excuse me but ... As an AFOL, what I do with Lego, specifically Technic and Mindstorms parts are very likely not what kids do. They couldn't - most of them don't own quite as much of the stuff as the (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Adrian Egli
|
| | | | Dean certainly has my vote on this Bionicle stuff. (How about a "Burn the Bionicle at the Beach Bonfire"?) When the Technic figure was first introduced back in 1986 (the 8600's sets) it was an interesting idea. One that could spark both interest in (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Todd Thuma
|
| | | | (...) Everyone probably already knows about this, but I thought I would get this out here anyway. LEGO Technic elements can easily be obtained by contacting (URL) resource for raw elements. $0.02 By the way, why doesn't LUGNET just make a BIONICLE (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Thomas Avery
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, but very expensive. IIRC, when Lego used to sell those accessory packs, they were about 1/2 as much. Granted it's been a long time since, I don't think they'd be as much if Lego still sold them. TJ (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) If they only would ship _outside_ US I'd be set (and broke)... (...) Bionicle is part of the Technic line of some reason. I would not mind having the bionicle folks in their own subgroup but they constantly flooded the technic group aswell. I (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | | In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson writes: <snip> (...) flood the Technic group? My definition of flooding would be scores of posts in a matter of days. Since the beginning of 2002, there has been a grand total of 123 Bionicle posts. It seems like (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | RE: Bi*nicle folks went away? William Howard
|
| | | | | | | (...) And don't forget the very, very meaningful debate about what MOTM should be called! Think that one got 72 per hour at one point. Discussion is healthy, its what sets us apart from the apes (or should that be Rahi?) William (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) That was meaningful to me, I got my name. The useless flame-war if Tim was right or not was a pity though since both him and I had agreed already. AND PLEASE DON'T BRING THIS DISCUSSION BACK TO LIFE AGAIN :))) (...) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | | (...) Did I mention English is my second language? Flood is obviously wrong word here, but I think I can turn this to my right :) Imagine the .technic.bionicle group has a wide stream of messages, if it get's to crowded they will flood .bionicle and (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | | | (...) the biggest single Bionicle discussion wasn't about Bionicle dierctly but about the avatars on Brickshelf. A regrettably polarizing situation that was resolved nicely by the various admins. - Kyle (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Gordon Bentley
|
| | | | | (...) Only problem is they don't have the full range of elements. Try finding half thickness lift arms for example. Or, my favourite, black beams, or any colour, but in the size/number I want. For example, I'm building a crane boom, and need 4 16U (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Find your nearset supplier at (URL) your bank balance!) ROSCO (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) carry big sets not parts :( (...) Thanks but it's a little late, say two years or since I got out of my dark ages cave :) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |