 | | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) Well Tobbe, When I started on rec.toys.lego (actually, it was alt.toys.lego) Joe Lauher had a Model of the Month segment where he'd pick a cool set and write about it: (URL) began in 1994 and ended in 1997. Obviously I'm not to judge what (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
I'm going to throw in my "dos centavos". FOR LEGO SAKE! This "MODEL OF THE MONTH" feces (putting nicely) is getting to be about as bad as those dorkheads who couldn't agree wether the 21st century began in 2000 or 2001! This "whatever of the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) *nods* When I wrote I had agreed and was looking for a new name, not a debate. I included the reasons, that's it. Something I kind of regret today since this whole matter is going out of hand... Mina två ören (Swedish: My two ören) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) All publicity is good publicity :) How about "t.c.f.k.a.m.o.t.m" (The competiton formerly known as Model of he month) or "I can't believe it's not Motm!" Steve (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) Shouldn't that be rendered as some form of graphic? (Like "squiggle-fishhook-tee", aka Prince) How about a Technic brick on a Calendar? William (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) William, you are of couse completely right that it shoud be a graphic. Now Prince's squiggle is a strange & useless contorted device. Therefore we should of course use a silouette of more or less any piece of bionicle :) Steve (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
ROFL William PS - You can borrow my flame-proof suit if you like! -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Steven lane Sent: 05 March 2002 16:34 To: lugnet.technic@lugnet.com Subject: Re: (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
