 | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Steve Lane
|
| | | (...) We say split the Technic and Bionicle into two all the time, but we never do anything about it. Who do we contact who can actually affect the changes? It's not actually that big a problem for me as I have 'Technic only, no sub-groups' as a (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —David Arnon
|
| | | | (...) Well, I think Todd is the only one that can do that. Presumably he reads the posts that have 'Todd' in them so I assume he read the relevant posts (I wrote one or two posts with that request with 'Todd' in them). (...) I think that if Todd has (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Seeing as Bionicle is clearly part of Technic according to TLC (after all, my Bionicle sets say "Technic" on them), it would be obvious to me that .bionicle will remain under .technic. Why? Because Todd has repeatedly indicated that he (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Steve Lane
|
| | | | | (...) I think if the English dictionary can change in accordance with what it's user's do, then so should Lugnet. Steve (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | (...) Seems sensical. (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
