 | | Re: 2000 US in-box Technic catalog
|
| Tom Stangl, VFAQman <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:38586B5A.AA6553...faq.com... (...) Please, use this one: (URL) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2000 US in-box Technic catalog
|
| Huw, I think you posted a broken link to your own site! :) :) (you replaced the '=' with a '-', and also, you typed 8250 instead of 8520 :) This one worked for me: (URL) for the full-size picture, (URL) and Michael Edwards has a whole slew of picks (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2000 US in-box Technic catalog
|
| Mark Koesel <koesel@umich.edu> wrote in message news:FMu5Jv.AuM@lugnet.com... (...) You are correct. Sorry :-( Huw (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2000 US in-box Technic catalog
|
| I must protest, Mr. Koesel, you were snooping around on a private site and posting the correct URL is a violation of Huw's privacy. <thwock> Er, what?... Never mind. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
| |
