Subject:
|
Re: I wish Lego made an "Anti-Backlash Gear"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:25:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
211 times
|
| |
|
|
As this discussion grows, I submit: (that) Part of the problem with
Mechanical flex, Gear "Backlash" if you will, Derives from many aspects when
we model maximun preformance from Axles, Gears, and all the elements
combined to produce desired effects. So I will stick with it until Lego
evolution catches up. In turn I stll want Stonger tolerences from Axles and
motors. Fine Mesh Grears. Wait what year is it again? 2085?
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Lane writes:
> In lugnet.robotics, Eric Sophie writes:
> > Hmmm...
>
> Explain 'Hmmm...' :-)
>
> I of course omitted the fact that my solution as described produces no
> mechanical advantage just a shaft going in the opposite direction. Of
> course, you can always replace the pair of gears on the second shaft with a
> pair of gears of a different size in order to gear up or down.
>
> Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
