To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 14758
14757  |  14759
Subject: 
Re: Gray code vs. Binary
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:00:23 GMT
Viewed: 
3732 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
To all those pneumatic gurus.....

The classic pneumatic timing circuit made with one switch per piston changes
state following gray code (i.e. only one piston changes at a time).  This means
that a two piston timer goes through these states:

00-10-11-10  vs. a binary sequence of:
00-01-10-11

For three pistons we get

000-100-110-111-011-001 a sequence length of 6 vs. binary that gets this:
000-001-010-011-100-101-110-111 a seqeunce of length 8.

To get a gray code of length 8 takes four pistons:

0000-1000-1100-1110-1111-0111-0011-0001

Has anyone spent time creating a binary sequencer for two or more pistons?  I
have not, and could use one if it was cheaper than gray code, either in time or
in parts.

Kevin

Hi Kev,

I think the cheapest way to do 3 or 4-bit binary with pneumatics would be to use
gray code and convert it.  Gray code always changes the least significant bit
possible in order to achieve a change to a new state, so there will always be
2^n states, just like binary.

Hi Mark,

  You are right.  I've had the wrong term in my head all this time.  Gray code
is not what I was thinking about I guess......  I'll have to go study Gray code
better, and then study your descriptions.  Man I wish you had a scanner and
could share drawings.

  I hate perceiving circuits through netlists :^)

  I'm going to see if I can make my problem work with Gray and skip the binary
part.  I was looking for a mechanism of using three piston to get 8 states,
instead of six.  Interesting ponderance.

Thanks!

Kev



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Gray code vs. Binary
 
(...) Haha! I've found a better way to do it, and a better drawing :-) Take my Pick and Place robot circuit: (URL) out the Elbow pistons and switch and connect the Elbow piston inputs to the Wrist piston instead (effectively draw the horozontal (...) (19 years ago, 20-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Gray code vs. Binary
 
(...) Hi Kev, I think the cheapest way to do 3 or 4-bit binary with pneumatics would be to use gray code and convert it. Gray code always changes the least significant bit possible in order to achieve a change to a new state, so there will always be (...) (19 years ago, 20-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR