| | Re: Build with Legos, be a part of history
|
|
In lugnet.mediawatch, Duane Hess wrote: (snip) (...) 9?? That seems overly complex. (...) or Moonbases! Cool. Someone's been cribbing ideas from the GBC activities I guess. (19 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: Pneumatic hexapod omni-Directional 2 (repost)
|
|
(...) Thanks David! You can see its rather unattractive predecessor here: (URL) of the goals of the remakes I posted was to make them look more elegant, by managing part colors, and hose routings more carefully. (...) There are movies of Quad242 and (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: Pneumatic hexapod omni-Directional 2 (repost)
|
|
<snip> (...) Oops.... (URL) (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Pneumatic hexapod omni-Directional 2 (repost)
|
|
(...) Hi Danny, Thanks for the feedback! Before I dig up a circuit diagram, I'll show you the timing diagram for my original hexapod, hex363: (URL) Hex363 can only walk forward, but has a hexagonal body. It gets its name based on the sequence of the (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Pneumatic hexapod omni-Directional 2 (repost)
|
|
(...) I'm going to ignore the ingenuity of the design and the wonderful concept (and implementation) of a pneumatic-logic controlled walker and just comment that it looks wonderful! I wish I could see it operating in person, I'm sure it would be a (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|