To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 14069
    Re: Relative or absolute? —Eric Sophie
   Here is my thought: Functional design is both relative and absolute. Let's define the context. In this I mean, when a given mechanical component can be modeled in Lego within a reasonable spectrum of variations. So if you want to replicate, let's (...) (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.technic)
   
        Re: Relative or absolute? —Eric Sophie
   (...) Was that a conversation killer or what? ??? e (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
   
        Re: Relative or absolute? —Steve Dunn
     (...) Relatively... Steve (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
   
        Re: Relative or absolute? —Ross Crawford
     (...) Absolutely!!!! ROSCO (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
   
        Re: Relative or absolute? —Jeff Szklennik
     (...) SNIP Less Filling! Jeff (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
    
         Re: Relative or absolute? —Rob Hendrix
      "Jeff Szklennik" <jeffszklennik@usaexpress.net> wrote in message news:IGB0ys.4ID@lugnet.com... (...) Tastes grey-t! (bley-t?) Rob (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Re: Relative or absolute? —Joseph Greene
   (...) Absotively Resolute!! (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
   
        Re: Relative or absolute? —Nathan Bell
   (...) Y'all are having too much fun! Eric Sophie had a good answer. There are either so many constraints that it is absolute or so little constraints that it is relative. (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR