 | | Re: Relative or absolute?
|
|
Here is my thought: Functional design is both relative and absolute. Let's define the context. In this I mean, when a given mechanical component can be modeled in Lego within a reasonable spectrum of variations. So if you want to replicate, let's (...) (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Relative or absolute?
|
|
(...) Was that a conversation killer or what? ??? e (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Relative or absolute?
|
|
(...) Relatively... Steve (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Relative or absolute?
|
|
(...) Absolutely!!!! ROSCO (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Relative or absolute?
|
|
(...) SNIP Less Filling! Jeff (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Relative or absolute?
|
|
"Jeff Szklennik" <jeffszklennik@usaexpress.net> wrote in message news:IGB0ys.4ID@lugnet.com... (...) Tastes grey-t! (bley-t?) Rob (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Relative or absolute?
|
|
(...) Absotively Resolute!! (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Relative or absolute?
|
|
(...) Y'all are having too much fun! Eric Sophie had a good answer. There are either so many constraints that it is absolute or so little constraints that it is relative. (19 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
