To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 12898
12897  |  12899
Subject: 
Re: Has anyone noticed this? Is it even important?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:45:40 GMT
Viewed: 
8196 times
  
Another part that has been changed is the black friction pin.

http://routetruck.com/pins.png

(I am not entirely sure which is old and which is new
actually :) Has this been noticed before?

On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:22:18 +0000, Anthony Sava wrote:

> In a recent discussion over at Classic-Castle about maces, something came to my
> attention.
> 
> The whole discussion is over this:
> 
> <<http://www.ikros.net/characters/images/Mace.jpg>>
> 
> It's a design for a minifig mace that I've been using for five years or so.
> I've never had a problem with it, but those who have never tried this style of
> mace before have complained that this design is flawed.  For them, the 8 toothed
> technic gear does not stay on the rod, it slips.  For me, I've actually seen
> these gears crack because the fit was so tight.
> 
> So I did some checking through Peeron.  Only one version of the 8 toothed gear.
> Same with Bricklink, only one version.
> 
> But when I started digging through my collection, I noticed that there is, in
> fact, two different versions of the 8 toothed gear.
> 
> <<http://www.ikros.net/temp/gears.jpg>>
> 
> The older version (left) has much sharper edges than the newer version (right),
> which has rounded edges.  These rounded edges on the newer versions means there
> is less plasic inside the technic hole, and thus less plastic to grip the rod
> for the mace design.
> 
> The teeth on the two gears also differ.  The older style gear has thinner,
> longer teeth than this newer gear.
> 
> Another noticable difference is the newer gear has a lip around the technic
> hole.  It seems that both gears have a sort of a lip around the hole on one
> side, where the 'teeth' in the technic hole are rounded to allow the technic
> axle an easier time of being pushed through the gear.  However on the older
> gear, on the other side, the 'teeth' are flush with the edge of the gear, there
> is no lip there.  With the newer gear's opposite side, there's a noticable lip
> where the 'teeth' don't reach the edge of the gear.  You can almost see this in
> the picture.
> 
> Also, though this is not very important, the light grey color on my newer,
> pre-2004 new style 8 toothed gears (the four or five I have) is a different
> shade than the older gears.  Perhaps a different plastic was used?  Or maybe a
> different temperature was used in making it?  Maybe a whole new color onto
> itself?  I don't know, I'm not knowledgable in these things.
> 
> Is this something that needs to be addressed?  Has this already been addressed?
> Should there be an official differentiation between the two designs?  Does
> anyone even care?  Or is this just something castle-heads need to worry about
> alone?
> 
> --Anthony

-- Peter
---------------------------------
Only when you try to build with Mega Bloks or you try to make a Lego compatible
cutting board do you realize the tremendous quality of Legos.

Peter Ehrlich
peter@dairysight.com
www.routetruck.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Has anyone noticed this? Is it even important?
 
In a recent discussion over at Classic-Castle about maces, something came to my attention. The whole discussion is over this: (URL) It's a design for a minifig mace that I've been using for five years or so. I've never had a problem with it, but (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, FTX)

6 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR