To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 12619
12618  |  12620
Subject: 
Re: SSClagorpion
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Mon, 10 May 2004 17:35:54 GMT
Viewed: 
16579 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:

<snip>

I don't think the RCX needs to do anything with the compressor.  That should be
all automatic.

However, I must tell you (from experience) that two RC Racer motors running
under load will cause the thermal resistor in a single battery box to heat up
and shut off the power in less than a minute.

So, I recommend using 1 battery box per RC motor.

I was assuming this.

I will consider sideways walking as still in and forget about part count right
now.



Do real scorpions actually walk sideways?  (my wife ask me this question)

I've had difficulties finding videos of scoprions ambulating.  I keep getting
hits on "Scorpion King".  Ack

On the topic of the pneumatic "stop/go" switch.....

If we have a pneumatic on/off switch between the compressors and the rest of the
pneumatic circuit, then when we flip off the pressure, we have no idea which of
the walking states we're in, or possibly we're transitioning from one state to
the next.  If we leave the beast on for 10 minutes, the pressure in the legs
will drop due to leakage.  The compressor cannot help with this leakage, because
it is isolated from the rest of the circuitry.  We run the risk of falling down.

I propose that our on/off switch(es?) be placed in circuit in a way that stops
the pneumatic state machine from transition to the next state.  This way when
the pressure drops due to leakage, the compressor will kick in and bring the
pressure back up.  With this, we introduce the ability to add a hold to any
state.


With the leg lock, I don't think loosing pressure will cause a problem.
However, as you said, it could easily be in an undefined state when turned off.

I agree.


Personally, I really like the idea of just controlling the state machine.  Your
drawing seems to show six states.  You said there are two pistons, so that
sounds like there are four possible states. (not counting transitions)  No, I
count six.  Anyway...

As far as the legs go, there are six states.  But there are two timing pistons
that each have to transition making a total of 10 states.

If we put sensors on the switches, can we detect which state it's in?  I still
like controlling the state machine, but this would give more info to the RCX,
and possibily eliminate the need to have a "hip" sensor.

Yes.  Electrically monitoring the pneumatic switches will tell you exactly what
state you are in.... except that pistons have three states.....  Expanded,
contracted, or transitioning.


Steve

Kevin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: SSClagorpion
 
(...) I don't think we need to worry TOO much about easing forces on the lock. My testing shows it works quite well. But there are many stresses on other parts as the legs get longer, and more angled, so moving them in is not a bad idea. (...) I (...) (20 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.technic)

300 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR