Subject:
|
Re: SSClagorpion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:49:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9783 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> You are going to put two touch sensors on one port?
>
> I thought you needed to know that the leg is fully extended,
> but not touching. How will you do that with one sensor port?
I can think of two was: use two touch sensors, and be able to read the state
of both of them (you can do this with a 3rd party multiplex, or cybermaster
sensors (which are kinda rare... right, Steve?), or use touch sensors stacked
with standard LEGO lights. Even using this last method (the roughest of the
bunch), I can easily get two touch sensors per port (and could get more, but it
gets bulky).
I'm trying to think of a good way to use two touch sensors ANDed together,
but a "false" reading doesn't tell you the legs have completed their motion.
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SSClagorpion
|
| (...) Again, the main goal is to know when the leg is extended, and the foot isn't touching the ground. So, you can mount the foot sensor so it's normally closed (pressed) except when the foot is on the ground and mount the leg sensor so it is (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SSClagorpion
|
| (...) OK. You are going to put two touch sensors on one port? I thought you needed to know that the leg is fully extended, but not touching. How will you do that with one sensor port? (...) You are right, he needs to balance on the three feet that (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
300 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
