Subject:
|
Re: SSClagorpion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:51:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8325 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
<snip>
> But...... if I use as little piston expansion/contract as I can to flip the
> switch, I end up with the shortest time for piston expansion/contraction. Cut
> the piston throw in half, and double your walk rate.
>
> I'll start on new designs using this concept. Because I'm building something
> that wants to tear itself apart, I'm going to use studded beams for extra
> strength.
So using #1 axle connectors as the linkage, we get a reduced piston expansion,
down to 86% of maximum.
Using technic axle joiner perpendicular, we can reduce the range to 70% of
maximum. I can't think of a way to make this any smaller.
Reducing the expansion range of the piston also reduces the leverage the piston
has on the switch, making it harder to throw, increasing pressure requirements.
Ignoring the pressure issue, a simple reduction of 30% of throw, decreases time
by 30%, so the increase in step rate is less than doubled.
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: SSClagorpion
|
| (...) Yes, I'd rather see a solid, strong, slow robot over a fast robot that succeeds in tearing itself apart. :) (...) That's the throw of the switches, right? Not the throw of the cylinders on the legs. So the legs will "move" at the same speed, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SSClagorpion
|
| (...) Thinking about this more....... One of the reasons that makes this slow is the inherent piston friction which combined with pressure defines the rate of expansion and contraction. So the rate is not very negotiable. But using rate * time = (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
300 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|