Subject:
|
Re: SSClagorpion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 02:27:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8435 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.technic, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > > You might want to study this:
> > >
> > > http://www.kclague.net/Quad242/index.htm
> >
> >
> > looks good. But slow.
>
> Yes, slow, more pressure, or more force. Shall I assume four pistons per leg?
That's up to you. I'd like to see it move as fast as possible, but I think even
if we make it as small as possible, it's going to weigh at least 10 pounds. 3
or 4 pounds will be the RCXs, battey box, Spybot, and motors.
So, what will it take to move that?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SSClagorpion
|
| (...) Hmmmm.... interesting question. I don't know much pneumatic theory, but..... Pressure is in pounds per square inch. So if we know the area of the face of a piston, and we know the pressure we can determine how many pounds a single piston can (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SSClagorpion
|
| (...) Nope, but we could just eliminate #1 by just turning of the compressors. (...) It is still on the list, I was just leaving it out of the equation for a moment. (...) Yes, slow, more pressure, or more force. Shall I assume four pistons per leg? (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
300 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
